Documentary: A Glitch in the Matrix (David Fuller production)

Sometimes there’s a glitch in the matrix where the limitations of the old operating system are laid bare and something new pokes through They’ve been dozens of responses to the jordan peterson channel for interview already. What makes this one different? Well, I have a pretty unique perspective in October last year I went to Toronto to interview Jordan Peterson at his home you came in from where I came in from London last night, I turned the interview into the first full-length documentary about Jordan Peterson’s ideas I Was pretty sure he’d soon become a lot more famous and be recognized as one of the most significant public thinkers but I couldn’t possibly have predicted how he’d break through to a mass audience a few weeks later Peterson did an interview with journalist Kathy Newman on Channel four News in the UK a Program I worked on as a reporter and producer for ten years It was a sensation Millions watched it online Tens of thousands commented an overwhelming majority felt Peterson had been unfairly represented And in the week since it hasn’t stopped Peterson has been asked about it constantly on the most high-profile online shows 12 rules for life so without reading this So what you’re saying is There’s only 12 things you need to do in life right, that’s it well yeah this This interview that you just did with this woman Kathy Newman shit was that in the UK it was Channel 4 UK so what does this glitch say about the state of mainstream media and the culture at large By diagnosis of what’s actually happening is that people are moving further and further away from? what is what thinking actually is I’m at or more into merely running a script and What does Jordan Peterson actually think that’s so controversial you are? misrepresented more than anyone I know in a weird way. You are villainized in a weird way where I can’t believe that these people are honestly looking at your opinions and Coming up with these conclusions. I believe this encounter struck such a nerve because it’s a cultural watershed moment But seen properly as Peterson would say it’s archetypal in that it contains layers and layers of meaning That go right to the heart of the biggest rift. We’re seeing playing out in the culture Over the next 50 minutes. I’m gonna do my best to unpack it From the clash between new and old media. There’s also why YouTube is gonna kill TV Because television by its nature all of these narrow broadcast technologies they rely on forcing the story all the way down to the mythological an Archetypal level I thought of ideologies as fragmentary mythologies That’s where they get their archetypal and psychological power, but in the postmodern world and this seems to be something that’s increasingly Seeping out into the culture at large you have nothing but the tyrannical father nothing But the destructive force of masculine consciousness and nothing, but the benevolent Benevolent great mother and it’s a it’s an appalling ideology, and it seems to me that it’s sucking the vitality Which is exactly what you’d expect symbolically It’s sucking the vitality of her culture and to ask how do we move forward constructively rather than just adding to the polarization? I’ve been a journalist for 16 years in the newsrooms of the BBC in channel 4 and then making documentaries I moved away from the frontline of news some time ago and started learning psychology Which is what first drew me to Jordan Peterson? from a distance I’ve started to see the blind spots of the establishment media much more clearly I Spent some of the best years of my working life at Channel 4 News and have a huge amount of respect And gratitude to the program But I’m making this film because I feel so strongly that if we can’t have open conversations about the kind of topics Peterson is raising We’re in serious trouble My book went up to number two and on in the US the next day right it’s number one in Canada it’s number three in the UK all on Amazon I Couldn’t have asked for more publicity right and so I could also be sitting back and saying well. You know she tried to My a person who regarded herself as my ideological opponent Tried to go after my philosophy and my reputation on national TV Failed brutally and has been taken apart for it. It’s like This is a good day, but I don’t regard it as a good day. I don’t think it’s a good day I think that it’s evidence of the Instability of the times that we’re in it would have been much better For me and for everyone else if what we would have had was a real conversation You said that it’s actually a sign of the times where things could go really wrong for all of us really soon Yeah, we’re playing with fire. Yeah, what do you mean by this? Can you can you elaborate? Well things go wrong in cultures all the time right you get you get the polarization Increases until people start to act it out Peterson is one of a new breed of thinkers made famous almost completely by the internet not the broadcast media Part of a powerful new informal network being called the intellectual dark web The mainstream media is based on an old dying model that is being replaced by new media And new technology so quickly that its faults are becoming glaringly obvious Fortunately, thanks to YouTube podcasting and however else you get shows like this one the mainstream media’s stranglehold on information Which really is a stranglehold on your ability to think clearly about the issues of the day is crumbling at an incredible rate? Now the question is who and what will replace it a few months ago one of my favorite people to sit across this table from Eric Weinstein came up with the phrase Intellectual dark web to describe this eclectic mix of people from Sam Harris to Ben Shapiro to his brother Brett Weinstein to jordan Peterson all of whom are figuring out ways to have the important and often dangerous Conversations that are completely ignored by the mainstream It’s why I would argue that this collection of people are actually more influential at this point than whatever collection of cable news pundits you can come up with If you think I’m being hyperbolic about the growing influence of this group just check the traction that these people get on Twitter or Facebook Compared to our mainstream competitors twitter may not be real life as I say in my Twitter bio But it is some barometer of what the zeitgeist is right now what unites this group of thinkers is a sense that the set of ideas that have run Western culture for years are breaking down and That the chaos of the moment is the attempt to find new ones It’s nearly all happening online part of the problem that we have right now in our culture is Trying to diagnose the level at which the discussion should be taking place And I think the reason that this is a tumultuous time is because it actually is a time for discussion of first principles and it’s that first principles are Virtually at the level of theology because the first principles are the things that you assume and then move forwards like well What should we assume well the dignity of the human soul let’s start with that you can’t treat yourself properly without assuming that you Have a relationship with another person you can’t stabilize your family You can’t have a functional society, so what does it mean for this human soul to have dignity? well The part of the idea is that you’re participating in Creation itself and you do that with your actions in your language And you get to decide whether you’re tilting the world a bit more towards heaven or a bit more towards hell And that’s actually what you’re doing so that’s a place where the literal and the metaphorical truth comes together and people are very They’re terrified of that idea as they should be because it’s a massive responsibility They also argue that the central problem is polarization boosted by social media Peterson’s work looks at how people are hard-wired to see the world differently a lot of what determines your political orientation is Biological temperament far more than people realize so for example left-leaning people liberals, let’s say although that’s kind of MIS misnomer, but We’ll keep with the terminology liberals are high in a trait called openness, which is one of the big five personality traits And it’s associated with interest in abstraction and interest in aesthetics it’s the best predictor of liberal political leaning and they’re low in trait conscientiousness, which is dutifulness and and Orderliness in particular whereas the Conservatives are the opposite? They’re high in conscientiousness They’re dutiful and orderly and they’re low in openness and that makes them really good managers and administers ministers and often businessman But not very good entrepreneurs Because the entrepreneurs are almost all drawn from the liberal types and so These are really fundamental fundamentally biologically predicated differences, and they’re you might think about them as different sets of Opportunities and limitations, and and certainly different ways of screening the world and Each of those different temperamental types needs the other type Let’s call this a diversity issue if you start understanding that the person that you’re talking to who doesn’t share your political views isn’t Stupid that’s the first thing necessarily. They might be but so might you be no stupid. He isn’t the Differences in intelligence are not the prime determinant of differences in political belief All right so you might be talking to someone who’s More conscientious and less creative than you if you’re if you happen to be a liberal But that doesn’t mean that that person’s perspective is not valid And it doesn’t mean that they wouldn’t outperform you in some domains because they would so one thing to remember is People actually do see the world differently. It’s not merely that they that they’re possessed of love ilie informed opinions the whole point of the dava democracy is to Continue the dialogue between people of different Temperamental types so that we don’t move so far to the right that everything becomes encapsulated and stone and doesn’t move or so far to the left and everything dissolves in a kind of Mealy-mouthed chaos and the only way that you can you can navigate between those two Shoals is by is through discussion, which is why free speech is such an important value It’s the thing that keeps the temperamental types from being at each other’s throats in The aftermath of the Trump election that came as such a shock to most of the media One of the most widely shared analysis pieces was from deep code It describes how the establishment mainstream media perspective based around liberal values of openness and inclusivity He calls the blue church is being challenged by a new web-based insurgency a red religion based on the values of tribalism The culture were the the 20th century was a decisive success for blue any effectively a route for red So what we see first is that red was forced to move into a deeply exploratory phase Second that it did this in a context Where as it turns out? things were changing meaningfully quite significantly in fact it from my perspective in a world historical level the emergence of entirely new forms of communication and therefore entirely new sense-making and coherence He concludes that the blue church is in the process of collapse as its dominant ideology Can’t adapt to changing reality But that a combination of the two sets of values of blue and red is essential we are conscious and Effective in the world in groups, not as individuals and the ingredients of those groups Include aspects that are currently showing up as both red and blue I Propose somewhat strongly that Neither red nor blue as pure Elements contain the ingredients necessary to actually be adaptive to reality This is a disaster in fact It’s a little bit like Separating the hand and the eye Now you’re the eye can see if the eye takes itself as being the essence of virtue it separates itself from the ability to do The same thing with the hand for most of human history these groups have actually always commingled They’re necessary that they actually relate to each other in a deeply healthy and direct fashion their separations into armed camps is Extinction area actually you know the values of red that you think blue needs to integrate you also may also reintegrate. Oh well That’s actually pretty easy Responsibility I mean we’ve actually even seen it The ability to Make a commitment and keep it Which which by the way ideologically shows up is either duty or loyalty, but those are both ideologies the the deeper sense is that ability Responsibility both of the individual in the group level the ability to actually really make a Personal sacrifice on the part of the group that’s actually a deeply read value and I don’t mean that by the way as Politically ideological certainly there are people who? Are currently part of blue who feel that deeply what I’m saying is that that shows up much much more intensely in Read and when you’re feeling it in blue. You’re actually feeling a red value, and that’s good mixing is crucial Because that’s very Jordan Peterson esque – How would you how do you define Jordan Peterson? Or do you think the fact the issue is that he is is not definable within one of those two camps Yeah, I think that’s the point I think that he grasps directly the fact that human beings can only actually make sense of the world by virtue of communication with other human beings and this is all about the notion of admixture that one must have a mixture of of What I mean he uses the mythopoetic to make sense the order order and chaos The way right the taoist way is the alchemical admixture of order and chaos And that’s it like that’s how you do it, and so if you bias towards orderliness You find yourself in a rigid non adaptive non creative non exploratory framework Which will die because the world changes if you bias towards chaos You you eat your young and evaporate Which also ties for obvious reasons? And the key is to actually enable these things to be in relationship with each other and vital healthy relationship with each other, and I think that’s in some sense the essence of what he’s Focusing on and instead of the core what he’s asking about Peterson is hard for the broadcast media to get a handle on Because the depth of his thought means he doesn’t fit easily into any of their categories The clash with Kathy Newman was his breakthrough a moment where the new world met the old To give the context from Kathy Newman side she has to do dozens of interviews each month Peterson is hard to get a grip on and he sure as hell looks controversial She’s also focused on getting sound bites for a five minute cut down of the interview for TV. Not a long conversation for online The interview was ridiculous. It was a ridiculous interviewing. I listen to it or watched it several times I was like this is so strange It’s like her determination to turn into a conflict – it’s one of the issues that I have with Television shows yeah, because they have a very limited amount of time, and they’re trying to make things as salacious as possible They wouldn’t have these sound bites these clickbait sound bites And she just went into it incredibly confrontational not trying to find your actual perspective But trying to force you to defend a non non realistic perspective. Yes well I was that I was the hypothetical villain of her imagination essentially. No this is also. Why YouTube is gonna kill TV Because television by its nature all of these narrow broadcast technologies they rely on forcing the story right because It has to happen now It has to happen in like often in five minutes because they only broadcast five minutes of that in interview They did put the whole thing up on YouTube to their credit It it it hasn’t ceased to amaze me yet. I think that they thought that the interview went fine after the interview Channel four News found themselves at the center of an online storm Which included some nasty personal and misogynistic attacks? It’s understandable that they just wanted it to go away But online is forever and as the center of gravity continues to shift away from traditional media this interview is I would argue a slow-motion and Continuing car crash for Channel 4’s credibility, so why did it happen? Partly the limitations of the medium of TV, but also because of the institutional political blindness of the mainstream media I’ve always considered myself of the liberal left, but especially since the election of Trump I’ve been trying to understand what happened and I’m convinced that the polarization We’re seeing is mainly driven by the shadow side of liberalism in particular where supposedly Inclusive social justice liberalism stops being inclusive and secretly judges and despises people that don’t think the same way the rebellion of Trump and brexit was a direct response as Yuri Harris argues in this article in Colet the new gatekeepers of the media have become a new bourgeoisie Enforcing a rigid etiquette and using the rights of the oppressed as an excuse to put forward a vision of the kind of society they personally want to live in on the surface level it’s about how a narrow social justice worldview embodied by Kathy Newman in the interview became the new status quo and How this institutional bias of much of the mainstream media? Means it can’t see or understand the forces that are challenging this new consensus The counterculture used to be on the left, but once it won. The culture war it left space for a new counterculture The biggest manifestation is the red pill phenomena which the mainstream media? Mistakenly assumes is the same thing as the OLT right? I was surprised to just discover the overlap between What I minute II particularly like Greek philosophy and stoicism and The alt-right who I’ve always thought of you know if I come across on the tour. I thought the most kind Swivel-eyed bogeymen you know completely unpalatable extremists in their in their basements and then to discover that You know a lot of them were a lot of people in stoicism were also really into the alt-right Made me wonder. What was going on and why? People like me were getting radicalized I’m drawn into if you explain. What stoicism is for Stoicism is basically an ancient Greek philosophy, which was became very popular in the Roman Empire You know with like the Emperor Marcus Aurelius was a stoic for example? And it’s in some ways like a Western form of Buddhism It’s like a therapy for the emotions it teaches you to take Responsibility for your thoughts to take and thereby to take some control over your emotions so in some ways it’s putting forward a model of strength and integrity and kind of resilience Amid adversity and rapid change so for that reason it’s become very popular in the last 10 years I Think this is also. Why from my perspective at least someone like Jordan Pederson Is often looked from the outside as being aligned with the alt-right because he has a similar message But it’s but there are crucial differences. I think between what we would consider I mean certainly white nationalism would be an essential part of the alt-right I would say of any useful definition, and yeah, that’s that’s certainly not characteristic of of Jordan Peterson from my experience No, there’s a crucial difference at least between stoicism and the alt-right Even though a lot of alt writers into stoicism in that stoicism, and and maybe Jordan Peterson as well I don’t know. I’m not an expert on him talk about the way to gain strength and maturity and power is Internal it’s to take responsibility for your own thoughts and feelings Whilst I think people sometimes men might look for that sense of power and control externally by suppressing or Segregating anyone who they feel threatened by whether that’s other colours or other sexualities or Gender so there’s a crucial difference there one is about kind of inner Integrity and and and just kind of being strong within yourself and the other is about trying to take control through the kind of exterior I Mean every public appearance that I’ve made that’s related to the sort of topics that were discussing is overwhelmingly men It’s like it’s like eighty-five to ninety percent And so I thought wow that’s weird like what the hell’s going on here exactly, and then the other thing. I’ve noticed is that? I’ve been talking a lot to the crowds that I’ve been talking to not about rights But about responsibility right because you can’t have the bloody converse. What are you doing? You can’t have the conversation about rights without the conversation about responsibility because your rights are my Responsibility that’s what they are Technically, so you just can’t have only half of that discussion, and we’re only having half that discussion the question is well What the hell are you leaving out if you only have that half of the discussion and the answer is what you’re leaving out Responsibility and then the question is well What are you leaving out if you’re leaving out responsibility and the answer might be well, maybe you’re leaving out the meaning of life That’s what it looks like to me. It’s like here you are Suffering away, what makes it worthwhile, right? You know you’re completely. Oh, you’re completely you have no idea what you’re You it’s almost impossible to describe how bad an idea that is responsibility That’s what gives life meaning It’s like lift a load Then you can tolerate yourself right because look at your useless Easily hurt easily killed. Why should you have any self-respect? That’s the story of the fall Pick something up and carry it pick make it heavy enough so that you can think yeah well Useless as I am at least I could move that from there to there well What’s really cool about that is that when I talk to these crowds about this the man’s eyes light and that’s very good I’ve seen that phenomena because I’ve been talking about this Mythological material for a long time and I can see when I’m watching crowds people you know their eyebrows lift their eyes let light up Because I put something together for them. That’s what mythological stories. Do so I’m not taking responsibility for that That’s what the stories do so I say the story and people go click click click You know in their eyes light up, but this responsibility thing That’s a whole new order of this is that young men are so hungry for that. It is unbelievable. It just blows me away It’s like really that’s what’s that’s the counterculture? Grow the hell up and do something useful really I could do that oh I’m so excited by that idea no one ever mentioned that before it’s like rights rights rights rights Jesus It’s it’s it’s appalling. It’s and and I feel that that’s deeply felt by the people who are who are coming out to To listen to these sorts of things to they’re they’ve had enough of that So and they better have because it’s it’s a non-productive mode of being responsibility man Peterson is part of the counterculture that he describes himself as a classic liberal and yet he’s frequently Described as right-wing by the media This is not limited to Peterson James d’amours infamous Google memo was described everywhere as an anti diversity screed Despite him specifically stating he wanted to encourage more diversity in the workplace Many believe that the Channel 4 interview was a significant moment in exposing this mindset as dogmatic reactionary and fixed so during the interview we see an example of a Delusional framework that is what appears to be largely incapable of perceiving and reacting to reality in real time but much more interesting is what happened afterwards which was the sort of the self-healing and policing mechanism of the larger social consensus of how when how the blue church Reactively goes about maintaining the integrity of its frame And so what ended up happened was there was a break in the frame there was a glitch in the matrix the Mechanisms of the blue church reacted to endeavor to control the frame and to convert it into a way of sense of Making sense of the what occurred that still maintained the integrity of its frame? Do you mean when they tried to characterize it as sort of? abusive trolls and you’re right hero, and all of that exactly exactly it’s sort of a to use of a military language it was a fallback position that was a Reactive almost instinctual and not almost in fact precisely instinct was that pure habit there was no Thoughtfulness or even strategic Action there it was if if X then Y and in this case Y is. Here’s a set of things that one does to re-establish the dominant frame and Now we’re now were two levels deep you know the first. Level was a sort of self-evident disaster, but then the second level was also a relatively self-evident disaster and There isn’t really a third level In this approach so it ends up happening, and this is again. You can kind of just think about this from ordinary psychology This is how? delusions fall apart As try as we might our desire to interpret reality to mean what we wanted to mean at the end of the day. We’ll always Be checked against what reality actually is It may be some time. You know we’re pretty good at making things up and pretending, but eventually Reality is reality this isn’t to say that Peterson is not controversial He’s saying things that challenge the most deeply held assumptions of the new establishment narrative I guess the other reason that people are on My case to some degree is because I have made a strong case which I think is fully documented by the scientific literature that there Are intrinsic differences say between men and women and I think the evidence and that this is the thing that staggered me is that? No serious scientists have debated that for like four decades It’s that argument was done by the time. I went to graduate school everyone knew that human beings were not a blank slate that biological forces not Parameterised the way that we thought and and felt and acted and and and valued everyone knew that the fact that this has become somehow debatable again is just Especially because it’s being done by legislative Fiat. They’re forcing it Part of Peterson’s argument based on years of psychological research is that much of the political? Conflicts are due to try to integrate the different political temperaments of men and women we were talking about the relatively the relative evolutionary roles of men and women this is speculative obviously and and Because our research did indicate. It’s tentative research so far that that the the the SG is SJW sort of equality above all else philosophy is more prevalent among women It’s predicted by the personality factors that are more common among women so agreeable this and high negative emotion Primarily agreeableness, but in addition. It’s also predicted by being female and so I’ve been thinking about that a lot because well men are bailing out of the humanities like mad and Pretty much out of the university is except for stem the women are moving in like mad And they’re also moving into the political sphere like mad, and this is new right we’ve never had this happen before and we do know know do not know what the Significance of it is it’s only 50 years old and so we were thinking about this and so I don’t know what you think about this proposition, but imagine that that that historically speaking, it’s something like Women were responsible for distribution and men were responsible for production Something like that and maybe maybe that’s only the case really in the tight confines of the immediate family But that doesn’t matter because that’s most of the evolutionary landscape for human beings anyways what the women does did was make sure that everybody Got enough okay, and that seems to me to be one of the things that’s driving at least in part the SJW demand for for equity and Equality it’s like let’s make sure everybody has enough. It’s like look fair enough You know I mean you can’t you can’t argue with that but there’s there’s an antipathy between that and The the reality of differential productivity you know because people really do differ in their productivity I think that the SJW phenomena is different and I think it is associated at least in part with the rise of women to political power and and We don’t know what women are like when they have political power because they’ve never had it I mean there’s been queens obviously and that sort of thing there’s been female authority figures and females have Wielded far more power historically than feminists generally like to admit, but this is a different thing And we don’t know what what a truly female political philosophy would be like, but it might be Especially if it’s not been well examined And it isn’t very sophisticated conceptually it could easily be let’s make sure things you’ve distributed equally. Well, yeah Why One of Peterson’s main influences is the psychologist Carl Jung Young psychology was built around the concept of the shadow all the things about ourselves. We don’t want to accept our anger negativity Unconscious judgments, and how we need to integrate all those disowned parts to grow I’m convinced. That’s what’s happening on a vast cultural level since leaving channel 4 news I’ve retrained as a counselor and started leading personal growth workshops for men And thought a lot about how these unconscious gender dynamics are playing out in the culture One of the central concepts is Jung’s idea of animus and anima possession How each have both an inner masculine and feminine essence in? A man when he’s unconsciously possessed by his feminine side his anima he becomes withdrawn Moody and reactive and when a woman is possessed by her male side the animus she becomes aggressive and dominating and How many women are pushed into that by the nature of the modern workplace? The Kathy Newman I know is warm compassionate a successful and talented journalist none of this is criticism of her Just the role she was playing in the interview I would say technically and this is might be interesting for people who are interested in union psychology If you want to understand what Carl Jung meant by animus possession which is a very difficult concept? Then that that interview was a textbook case of having a discussion with someone who is animus possessed life has been moving forward for three and a half billion years and It moves forward in these pattered and manners like the dominance hierarchy for example, so that’s that let’s call that the masculine archetype It’s part of the masculine archetype in fact the onus Proclamation was that the female representation of the male so that’s the animus is the Dominance hierarchy it’s the patriarchy So that’s that that’s the unconscious archetype, which I think is extremely interesting given what’s happened say in the women’s movement because that’s what’s projected onto men and and It can be projected in a very negative way it doesn’t have to be but it can be and so an animus possessed woman treats a man as if he’s the Manifestation of the tyrannical patriarchy he’s a group he’s that group of men Yeah, the group of bad men actually you watched the Jordan Peterson Kathy Newman entity. What did he what did he think I? My whole body contracted, and I I felt so sad for womanhood I felt disappointed and I Could see how the shadow part of womanhood was acting out I could see how the collective rage was acting through Kathy Newman and This is what happens is that when that’s unknown its projected blindly on to Whatever stick wherever it sticks and it was very clear that she already had an agenda and she already had a projection that she was just Looking to state she was she was just looking to have that confirmed so I felt on behalf of women I felt sad and disappointed because we need to have intelligent conversations, and I also want to say that this isn’t even though the the specific example is the Kathy Newman Jordan Peterson interview, it’s not specific to – Kathy Newman I think the fact that that interview has resonated with so many people that it’s been so popular shows that actually something archetypal was going on in that in that interaction And I think as well why it’s gone viral is a lot of people watching it Recognize those dynamics. They’re like I’ve been in conversations like that I’ve been in this conversation where nothing I say works where nothing I say gets through So there’s something sort of fundamental about about the masculine feminine dynamic. That’s going on in there What do you think that is I think Jordan Peterson? He’s everyman Kathy Newman She’s every woman I can tap into that rage like this I know it in myself and women that say they don’t they’re just denying it because it is in the collective So in that sense it just highlighted what what’s that? It’s wonderful because here we really get to look at why is this so? Important why is it so important to listen to? To a thinker like Jordan Peterson and take it seriously and say what can we do with it? It’s just so obvious that it’s needed Because if this is where we are if this is where society and cultures is if this is the ability to have an intelligent conversations Conversation then we are in trouble, I really feel that there is this collective subconscious rage that is just boiling in women and it’s coming up in so many ways we see we see in the media and What’s going on is this? unknown Rage that comes up in in many different ways um And on one hand it needs to come out we need to clear it it needs to be expressed it needs to Be acknowledged on the other hand it’s not enough. This is only like this is breaking the ice So that the next step of evolution, can you know? Consciousness can start coming through and that’s what I’m lacking in women. It’s really to take responsibility for what we do as women in our Manipulation in our seduction in our control, and and it’s so easy for women to say but that’s just because we angry and men did this and patriarchy, but it’s It’s such a lack of responsibility and this Women really need to know I mean, that’s the the kind of shadow work is The acceptance that we all have shadows that men certainly have a shadow. There is a shadow around masculinity but there’s also a shadow around femininity and while part of the cultural conversation now is toxic masculinity and everyone knows what you mean by toxic toxic masculinity if You talk about toxic femininity Everyone still knows what you mean, but you can’t have that conversation Which is it’s it’s interesting? What is allowed to be said and what is not allowed to be said at the moment and that that I think is? is very Dangerous that certain topics certain conversations are off are off-limits And this is where we see where we see the victim persecutor dynamics activates it because women become the become the victims, and we make ourselves the victims and we Persecute men but in that aggression in that rage and when we are the victims. We are in perfect control we become the persecutors because we say It’s all about blame Men did this and men need to take responsibility But in that we become the persecutors, and it’s also very difficult as well because one imagines that that Combative attitude is something that has served her well in the past and it’s something that She’s maybe felt forced into because of the nature of the society that she’s operating in so it’s a kind of catch-22 situation for the many successful women because they feel that they’re pushed to be more masculine and Then when they’re more masculine they get judged for being more masculine It’s it’s very sad and and and I can see that dynamics being played out absolutely But I think the only thing we can do is to take responsibility okay? I’m doing that do I really want to compromise my femininity do I want to compromise my integrity? Do I want to compromise my gender and? Play that or is there another way that I can be powerful without being aggressive without playing a power game But resting in my natural power resting in my natural dignity Resting in that deep rootedness that we both have in our genders that When we are peace with it and when we acknowledge it in ourselves It’s there as a natural thing and and this is the thing I don’t want to make this personal about Kathy Newman Because it’s it’s in that potential is in every woman, but it’s because we are persecuting our own femininity What’s being played out that we’re doing it to ourselves because we don’t trust that it’s good enough to be a woman We don’t trust that we can have conversations that come from a felt embodied perspective. We don’t trust that we’re connected to truth because these these Masculine ways have been have been very strong and women have been denying their own power In my work over many years of working with this I find that very few women Grew up in households which really? Loved admired respected honored cherished the feminine and So there is intrinsically for so many women who’ve grown up in the I don’t know the last hundred years that say A kind of devaluation of the feminine that gets taken on and of course and as well as abuse aggression all sorts of things so very Many women out of an intelligent strategy to survive Develop their masculine side as a defense against that devaluation for the feminine and over time they become very Identified with that masculine side the male equivalent is animal possession in anima possession it’s the loss of relaxed confidence in the Groundedness in the masculine and is overwhelmed by his own inner feminine side a passive withdrawn moody bitchy Complaining not showing up kind of guy, which I think is really so much what feminists are angry about I Don’t see them as really angry about the masculine per se but it the way that Males behave, and you know I have got a lot of compassion for that Because for myself and most men that I know we weren’t really shown how to be as men We didn’t really get initiated into it and so and then this strong thing comes from feminism And we feel like it’s it’s maleness. That’s wrong, and it’s not it’s not maleness. That’s wrong. I don’t even think feminism feminists hate The masculine it’s like what the call is really for men is to develop their masculine strength presence courage be relaxed and confident be protective and be strong and Under this kind of assault which has come from a lot of animus possessed women a lot of men have retreated And I think gone into feeling guilty about being men and have become passive Indecisive and in that way a kind of feminized man has emerged Those who followed Peterson’s thought recognize his analysis goes all the way down to the bedrock to the Archetypal structures of consciousness itself the thing that I really see happening and you can tell me what you think about this in annoyance book Consciousness which is masculine symbolically masculine for a variety of reasons is is viewed as rising up? against the countervailing force of tragedy from an underlying Feminine symbolically feminine unconsciousness right and it’s something that can always be pulled back into that unconsciousness That would be the microcosm of that would be the Freudian eatable mother Familial dynamic where the mother is so over Protective and all-encompassing that she interferes with the development of the competence not only of her sons But also of her daughter of her children in general, and it seems to me that that’s the dynamic That’s being played out in our Society right now is that there’s this and it’s it’s related in some way that I don’t understand to this to this Insistence that all forms of masculine Authority are nothing, but tyrannical power so the symbolic representation is tyrannical father with no appreciation for the benevolent father and benevolent mother with no appreciation whatsoever for the tyrannical mother right and that’s that and Because I thought of ideologies as fragmentary mythologies That’s where they get their archetypal and psychological power right and so in a balanced representation you have the terrible mother and the Great Mother as Anointment laid out so nicely and you have the terrible father and the great father So that’s the fact that culture mangles you have to death well It’s also promoting you and developing you you have to see that as balanced, and then you have the heroic and adversarial individual But in the postmodern world and this seems to be something that’s increasingly Seeping out into the culture at large you have nothing but the tyrannical father nothing But the destructive force of masculine consciousness and nothing, but the benevolent Benevolent great mother and it’s a it’s an appalling ideology, and it seems to me that it’s sucking the vitality Which is exactly what you would expect symbolically, it’s sucking the vitality of our culture you see that with the increasing demolition of of young men And not only young men in terms of their academic performance Which like they’re falling way behind in elementary school way behind in junior high and bailing out of the universities like mad and so And I well the public school education it’s become completely permeated by this kind of my anti male propaganda I mean, and I need to mean public schools are just a form of imprisonment. You know right now They’re particularly destructive to young men who have a lot of physical energy You know you know I identify as transgender gay mic myself way But I do not I do not require the entire world To alter itself okay to fit my particular the self-image I do believe in The power of hormones I believe that men exist and women exist and they are biologically different. I think that I think there is no cure for the culture eles right now except if men start standing opera in demanding that they be Respected as men here’s the problem You know this is something my wife is pointed out to she said well men are gonna have to stand up for themselves But here’s the problem. I know how to stand up to a man who’s Who’s? unfairly Trespassing against me and the reason I know that is because the parameters for my resistance are quite well-defined Which is we talk? We argue? We push and then it becomes physical? Right like if we move beyond the boundaries of civil discourse We know what the next step is ok, that’s forbidden in in discourse with women So I don’t know like it seems to me that it isn’t men that have to stand up and say enough of this even though That is what they should do it seems to me that it’s saying women Who have to stand up against their crazy sisters and say look enough of that enough man-hating enough? Pathology enough bringing disgrace on us as a gender but the problem there And then I’ll stop my little tirade is that most of the women. I know who are saying are busy doing same things, right? They’re off they have their career. They have their family They’re quite occupied And they don’t seem to have the time or maybe even the interest to go after their their crazy harpy sisters And so I don’t see any regulating force for that that terrible femininity, and it seems to me to be Invading the culture and undermining the the masculine power of the culture in a way, that’s I think fatal I really do believe that I too I too believe these are symptomatic of the decline of Western culture And we and it will just go down flat. I don’t think people realize that you know Masculinity still exists okay in the world as a code among jihadists, okay? And when you have passionate masculinity, okay? Circling the borders like the Huns and the Vandals during the Roman Empire that that’s what I see I see this culture rotting from within okay, and disemboweling itself literally We have this Bit of combat let’s say It produced a scandal Now we actually talked about it Yeah No tricks just a conversation And then everybody wins right because I can admit whatever mistakes I made she can admit whatever mistakes She made we can drop the persona So you’re saying the polarization that we’re seeing right now that we are speaking out. It’s not In the future we will act out that polarization well if we don’t if we keep Accelerating it especially if we keep accelerating with lies. Yeah, you know and and this this whole channel for Rat’s nest is like 90% lies. Maybe more and You know a lot of its ideologically motivated lies, but it doesn’t matter it still lies like Kathy as I said There was virtually nothing she said in that interview that was actually Coming from her like like a deep part of her the soul of her or so it was all persona It was all persona and and and all use of words in a in a Expedient manner as tools to obtain I think probably probably status dominant status and reputation I mean what advice would you give to people to? To navigate this new world the first is for your mind. Be aware of the fact that the habits of the blue church and And how it works Don’t work anymore recognize that your way of making sense in the world that used to work Don’t work, and you really really need to set yourself free to begin learning the new child’s mind beginner’s mind second this by nature must in fact be exploratory so Swim, do not make sense prematurely in spite of the fact that the world feels dangerous inside of that you may want to protect yourself in this dangerous world Doing so too quickly did not allow the natural exploratory Approach to do what it needs to do really, just listen and Learn go all the way dad back down to human base Turn inward Learn how fear shows up in you Learn how not to allow fear to drive the choices that you make Learn how to listen to the whole way that all of you perceives. What’s going on become more integrated with your own body Go out into nature Spend a lot of time not connected to the chaos That’s going on and a lot of time Reconnecting yourself with your fundamental capacity to perceive reality in all the different modalities these human beings have the capacity to do Then relearn how to use other human beings as allies in figuring out how to make sense of the world I mean that really relearn like we have been abused and constrained by institutional frameworks that remove us from our own native capabilities So relearn that understand how to be a friend and an ally how to have a conversation with somebody where you’re really listening closely To get a sense of what their perspective brings to you where you’re not obligated to agree with them We are not obligated to move out of what you feel is right to form some new Consensus reality, but where you’re actually authentically? Recognizing that their perspective has some capacity to bring richness to your perspective This by the way is almost exclusively possible in person and what we’re doing right now is an OK version of it But we need to be very mindful the fact that Linear broadcast is bad and even interactive Bandwidth like this. It’s not good enough. You know you’ve got to learn from raw Physical and get yourself into places where your consensus reality, and your habits are willfully destroyed Human to human conversations and and get as far away from ideology as you can Your job is not to know what the fuck is going on Your job is to be absolutely certain that you have no idea what the fuck is going on and learn how to feel from raw chaos from raw uncertainty up Then and only then are you finally able to begin the journey of Beginning to form a collective intelligence in this new environment That’s my advice this is why we’ve created rebel wisdom to host these conversations to try and unpack what’s going on and through our workshops and events Start to build this collective intelligence for the future To see longer versions of the interviews featured in this film and our full-length documentary about Jordan Peterson check the rebel wisdom website Help us create more films about these subjects by sponsoring us on patreon and come to our events to have these conversations in person You

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Post navigation

100 thoughts on “Documentary: A Glitch in the Matrix (David Fuller production)

  1. yes. he is spot on. all this new stuff. all these lies now exposed. we need a new philosophy; some way to think about it all. he says it goes back to theology which I suppose it does; but most of us are tangled with the old faux religions which are traps; so until philosophy shows us the way I think theology isn't our friend. but neither atheism nor petersens own darwinian materialism can possibly be the right answer. I would be happy to tell him why..

  2. well i'm a recovered feminist. I know its demonic. I am prepared to stop the feminazis. but if I do I would just hang the worst and remove the vote for them arrested the third time for riotous behaviours. so I am probably a harsh sort of cure..

  3. Sometimes picking up a load can cause serious troubles. Like when you commit yourself to the pursue of goodness and virtue. This can unsettle certain wicked powers and weaken their position of power. In every day life you can become a pariah and get framed because of picking up a load or a responsibility like telling the truth, being fair or other virtuous pursuits.

  4. I remember the 70's in Europe and it was incredibly intellectually open and free. People enjoyed provocative left field questions and interesting new ideas.. no one imposed a rigid orthodoxy on people. An accepted narrative that you wernt allowed to stray from or risk suffering serious sanction… The "you cant say that" mob seemed to appear in the late 80's centred around the Marxist feminist, politically correct left. They got control of education and the media but forgot the internet, and they cant admit openly that the control they want is not compatible with a free modern society. They've kind of left themselves nowhere to go.

  5. When confronted with truth or reality, people will deny the existence of the truth because of their reality. Much the same as a dog who will not cross a point in his owners yard because he is used to having a fence which is no longer there.

  6. The only group you need to succeed in life is a family that is normal and stable, and a successful economy.

  7. If you want the complete truth then RESEARCH THE FLAT EARTH TOPIC NOW!!! YOU WILL LEARN THE EXACT TRUTH……!!! DO IT NOW.

  8. Some thoughts. Is the world of the Saudi men and women in their ultra traditional roles to be envied above the Westerners? Are most women in the Western society on the rampage against males? Are there not balanced people to be found among us who are comfortable with themselves and each other? I don't doubt that there are idealogical movements on campuses but then beyond that there is all kinds of chaos of a different nature, the fallen nature, that never really washes out, but keeps on repackaging itself.

  9. I never bought into the lefty nonsense ab’t Peterson. Oppressed DWI? Hah! Yrs ago I saw Shapiro debate Max Blumenthal on Israel with Shapiro beaten badly. Good times. JP figured out how to monetize opposing the SJ crew. Good for him. I never had any use for either. All offset by freak show Trump chaos, the Republican Party, Big Oil, Russia & Israel. A formidable opposition. Peterson is impressive as long as you’ve never seen him with *ucker Carlson with Peterson looking next to death talking about youth mental health.

    Reminding me of 2014 when Dr Ben Carson was on Fox “News” looking sad & sick himself talking to a female host ab’t terrorists putting Ebola laced urine in US drinking water. Then you hear, “hey, they all do it, they all lie bc they’re all the same Party” when trying to normalize Hannity Dobbs conservative compulsive liars4hire.

  10. Firstly, stop using the terms "collective and collectively". Stop living under the Marxist idea the if we all just look, act, and think the same way, that the world will become a peaceful utopia. Imagine a world with that type of collective hive mind. Sounds like a page right out of George Orwell's " 1984" or Aldus Huxley's "Brave New World". That type of distopic society not only sounds boring but also very dangerous to personal liberty and free will. We as human beings will never look, act, and think the same way. Want proof, travel through any country's rural and urban areas, what you will find is stark contrasts.

  11. Let me mansplain wile you womensplain responsibly means growth of ears ,for each gender . Love your honesty. But Love each other.

  12. Karl Jung mentioned our collective consciousness and I feel like we're watching a polarization of it. I feel like I'm in a "take reality show" when I go out into my society

  13. The thing I love about JP is he sees value in both sides of the political spectrum. On the converse, he sees the negative pitfalls of both sides.

  14. I really can't believe people pay huge sums of money to get an ink stain on a piece of paper from these soothsayers.

  15. This all started with the fall of masculinity. Women were made to step up the second the man fell unfortunately good men are few and far between. If you’re reading this no matter what age you are you need to strive to be the best man you can be and then teach the young men and even older men around you how to be a better man.

  16. why is there red and blue scattered amongst logos and flags? The roman catholic church can tell you that answer. its called the inquisition, that is still going strong to this day folks. Its City of london uk, Vatican in rome and washington DC usa. the triple crown.

  17. Disappointing. Filmmaker makes much mention of C4 Cathy Newman interview but plays no clips in evidence. Then there's a long interview with Greenhall from 11:45 – too much of a digression imo. So I gave up at that point.

  18. Yes but the evil blue Church controls YouTube and I'm turning it into television we're dragging and kicking and screaming

  19. The sjws control YouTube they control all of the big internet sites just like they control the mainstream media that's the problem they have to have the levers of control tour why from their hands

  20. The collective rage in women is misplaced. They live consequence free lives by and large and if they were actually brought under the law like men and were imprisoned for the same things men were the rage would go to the target it should go to, the woman in the mirror that is the real author of her own problems.

  21. "The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. ”

    -Alvin Toffler

  22. 34:38 – 41:21 is very powerful and very correct. Women have so much power that is untapped, and there are shadowy sides to both genders – but collectively, humanity needs to wake up to this knowing within and our capacity to come together w what constitutes and fully embodies these divine masculine and feminine archetypes.

  23. MSM is dying a slow politically correct death. Its ugly sure! But we need it and will master it. We are ingenious

  24. Life is duality , information , no matter the source should always be levvyed in on atleast 50% intuition before soaking anything in . We are born with this . Use it . Polarise .

  25. Too bad YouTube is becoming just as bad as the msm and censorship. This platform is dying a slow but sure death because of it. Sad to see a corporation turn its back on its own citizens and their constitutional rights to follow a dead msm protocol. They've become the enemy of the people. All they produce is false disinformation on topics that do not matter and zero information on topics that do. It's North Korea all over again! And the sick part…. some Americans are actually FIGHTING for it!!! Let THAT sink in!!!

  26. She said an unknown rage…like my mother…I could see the rage,,the insanity in her eyes when I was a child…women need to also take responsibility…then I saw this in all women…then social engineers say males are toxic,, a form of insanity they believe…and who raised these toxic males?…toxic women who blame man for their toxic rage.

  27. My mother ruined us…three toxic males and three toxic females…we all rage and foam at the mouth…but now…in retrospect….I see where my rage comes from…without blame…without remorse…I understand me…and with self therapy….from books,,talking to wisdomic people…and looking at the unchanged behavior of those who hated me as a child…the dots began to connect…and the healing began

  28. So far to the right would be perfect. Blue Church = Synagogue of Satan. Red religion = controlled opposition. Sodomy and abortion is blue. Reds say, okay. The WHITE CHURCH is order.

  29. Feminism–globalism–multiculturalism-it's all a lie. An Orwellian control grid social engineering media propagated lie designed to DIVIDE us against each other into warring factions…then CONQUER our weakened depleated selves. The controllers figured out a long time ago that the easiest way to destroy people is to instigate conflict within our own ranks and let us destroy each other so they won't have to. Feminism is the perfect example. Divide the women AGAINST their own men. Once the men (the stronger ones) have been destroyed it's easy to move in and destroy the stragglers (women and children). Same with Multiculturalism. Throw all the races together and let them tear each other to shreds then mop up and TAKE OVER.

  30. Jordan Peterson and Stephan Molyneux are two of the most insufferable personalities on the internet. Listening to them talk ideas wastes more of your time than if you chose not to think about anything at all.

  31. Identity politics cannot be defeated, realize this and realize immigration are imported new votes against you. 70% of all immigrants vote democrat. So why do you folks continue to support immigration.

  32. The problem with JP is (leaving his theism aside for the moment) is he really doesn't understand the difference between left and right. He has bought into the insane idea that you can be too far right. You can't. No part of the right disdains change, we only ask that it be done through evolution, not revolution. There is no such thing as "extreme" right, by it's very definition it merely, at most, wants to return to previous values. Only the left can be "far" or "extreme" because they are the ones that want to change, or overturn, traditional values.

  33. Love it. Best piece I have seen is a long long LONG time. Thank you for taking the time to compile and share. I have shared the link with conservative friends as well as liberal. Hope they get something from it just as I did. Thank you.

  34. I've been trying to tell people this for a while now. 99.999% of people are in the center. They have common sense, not ideology. But truly, it's more like a circle. Far far right and far far left governments do exactly the same things to their citizens. Look at Nazis on the far far right and Communist on the far far left. Basically the citizens lived in the same circumstances given different names.

    So, as is said in this program, it's our DUTY to start talking to one another, agree to disagree, and realize – we aren't that different in our daily lives and families and ethics. The media and politicians try to divide and conquer. People don't realize that the uber rich are playing us like puppets. These sociopaths and psychopaths (literally) are deciding which groups will be enemies at any particular time. They do this at Bilderburg & Trilateral Commission, etc meetings. It's sent out to the media. They're used to whip people into a frenzy. Even scripted. They LOVE to use racism and politics to do this.

    We toil away in servitude to a faceless corporation to feed our families and provide shelter, while these bastards own 98% of the wealth of the world! THEY are the orchestrators of ALL the division! As long as we're distracted fighting amongst ourselves, they can destroy the planet and lobby the politicians to allow them to do any dirty underhanded thing to the masses, basically anything they want. And one of the things they want, infact NEED, is to keep you so busy working to provide for your loved ones and so busy fighting with the other little guy that you pay no attention to them and the vastly unfair systems we live under.

    Until we all stop being their puppets nothing will change and the world will become a dump while we kill each other for whatever tribe we belong to??! SMH

    These multi billionaire types are incapable of empathy or remorse. Many studies have shown this to be so. PLEASE people! Wake up! Take a look around and realize who your real enemy is and why they keep you hating the 'others'. It's been going on for millennia now.

    Remember the 99% peaceful protest that ended in the people being permenently blinded and scarred with military grade pepper spray? Why such overwhelming force? They let cities be destroyed over provocated racism, but when people protest this system…. They really bring the pain! It's why we ALL need to stand together! They cannot stop us all. Talk to your neighbors about what's REALLY happening. Do it for your children.

  35. yes just a next stage of the illusion the lady did a perfect job as did Jordan both did their best to do the script justice this isn't red or blue just their way of progressively mindfucking you

  36. Intellectual dark web? Screw you and anyone that uses that. It’s a word created by Mainstream Media and proof they’re scared when they don’t control the narrative. I loved Peterson’s latest book… read it!

  37. Rothschilds, Rockefellers, landowners bankers along with all the wealthies people on this horizontal line are working together against the rich, the middle class, and the poor. Using lies, deceptions, limitations, etc…. education, NASA, media, governments. No integrity, no dignity, no truth in them. They are the predator and we are the prey.

  38. We are in captivity if you can't see that you don't know what freedom is and I don't blame you when you born a slave. Your mind have been stolen from you

  39. I'm not a mathematical scholar but play one on YouTube. Balance is not 1/2's but in 1/3's balance in the middle

  40. What about operating from a soul level and stop playin into a gender script? I personally enjoy surrounding myself with two spirited gender people as I am one (someone who channels both female/male energy to navigate through life). I find those people are much more in touch with a higher state of consciousness. In the spirit world there is no gender there is no race there is no competition — this is pure love, pure acceptance, and pure synchronicity — that is the world I want to live in. But maybe I’m living at the wrong time/dimension and my view point is weak in its argument. Something has to change as we are spiraling downward at an alarming rate as a species because we focus more on differences than similarities. So many unhappy people and low vibrating humans creating a world that is fear based. ~~ Signed Cookie

  41. Who will replace MSM ? Know one , i believe that's the plan to destroy all credibility destroy the fabric of society until where left with know one to trust and turn on each other . We are being forced to take sides . Establishment agenda . Keep the citizens divided and maintain control . I believe we could be witnessing the beginning of the end of America . I believe the powers at be are setting the stage for the next culling of humans . A population of this magnitude is threat . Culture is broken god is dead respect is lost we have become divided and jaded sick and that's the excuse they are building and society is falling into trap and won't wake up until it's to late . Human nature !

  42. Beware Jordon Peterson. There is much to be skeptical about but Peterson draws some mistaken and dangerous conclusions. He is a pseudo intellectual with an agenda. Find some authentic resources for your intellectual pursuits.

  43. Liberalism has been hijacked by evil technocrats. A truly open mind must be open to all possible perspectives, even to those it disagrees with. Orwell said ''It is not power that corrupts absolutely, but obedience'' . The victimhood culture disgusts me. It's time to speak out now against the encroachment of tyranny. This will very certainly be our last chance to do so.

  44. There are only two real 'intellectuals' in the so-called 'Intellectual Dark Web'. Sam Harris & Jordan Peterson and their area of expertise is limited to what they have trained themselves. The rest are all radio/talk show hosts at best. What people need to notice and be careful about is that all these intellectual/political/academic and media forums are pretty much made exclusive to the Jewish community. They are on both sides of the aisle in order to be the judge, jury and executioners of any important issue the country has to face. This kind of coordination helps to drive their broader global agenda. Unless this monopoly is broken and diverse intellectual voices are brought in, the problems most countries (including the US) face will persist into the next generation.

  45. what people, male and female, are angry about are being sexually repressed by religion (or sexualized by pop culture media–two sides same coin). anyway, monotheism is at fault for this, and tribalism was destroyed by the nuclear family. worker owned cooperative business are best whereby whole families/friend circles can work in close knit circles with the youngsters running about near by…back to the tribal mode where BOTH parents are working in same co-owned businesses and the whole family-aunts uncles grandmother etc stay in tact. the problem is not feminism breaking the nuclear family but the nuclear family destroying the extended tribal mode. Hippys tried this but drugs and big corp got int he way but I have a model to make this work through a franchise model (audiobooks on my channel) (heavy into editing my books so excuse the grammar, I have "editors block:)

  46. Seen alot about this thing called reality .. can anyone define or explain or tell me what reality really is ? What is the reality that we aren't seeing that will eventually assert itself and everyone is going to go .. ohhhh ! Trump 2020 !

  47. 17:51 Can someone please explain how that attack was misogynistic? I mean its like if someone does the format of comparing female who got rekt to another female who got rekt (I mean fine, Chris's attack jokes may be distasteful but still) then it's sexist? I don't see how.

  48. prohibition happened because men were drinking away the paychecks–does anyone wonder why women may feel more secure in the workforce? what about the hunger of the intellect, the expression of the innovative spirit inherent in all of us (after all, women most likely invented agriculture?) then we have the issue of wife battery, how many have no financial escape from this? then we have the fact of incest (1in3 girls/1in5boys). then we have the fact that we live in a military-industrial complex. do I support women in the military? no–but neither do I support men in the military doing the dirty work for Big Oil. do I praise a feminist climbing her way up the ladder at Lockheed or Coca Cola? no, but I also do not support the man in this endeavor. we ALL need to go towards entrepreneurship in the sustainable marketplace, worker cooperatives (no day care necessary–bring the little ones to work and set up a play room:) this is the solution, all this "dialectic" misses the big bad bullet points of this BS military industrial complex. we ALL need to get out of that horrifying limiting paradigm and push forward the holistic, entrepreneurial, organic, hemp, co-op, yoga, fair trade, simple living, Zen splendor of a brilliant new paradigm!!

  49. funniest interview on the net…. will he notice that all the years is in edit-mode. a censor world .. even wikimedia does very well financially as well as deleting any thing they want , same with google , ++++++++ could imprint generations of minds .could ~? waking up the timelines first of how to convince or entrap . the mainstream is the dark ….when the A I does more thinking ( which masses of population could effect ~) opposite of its controllers… maybe the satellites may learn stir-fry .. mit and many more will the A I have to pick the difference of lib/consv/a cia good/bad/ language outcreate a one world language .. a i style… that is there already yet most are with some kind of computer by now ~ fast or slow/ controllers/ not so hidden… the play on the public for net neutrality ~, nura nuro head s a glitch —————————————–

  50. Can we please stop calling it the “Mainstream Media” and instead call it what it is, viz, Corporate Media. That lot are playing to the 60s generation because so many of those people aren’t accustomed to the fact that it’s biased and always has been. Say what you will about the current group of 20-somethings but they do think for themselves even if you don’t agree with them. People who won’t think for themselves will be left behind and so will Corporate Media.

  51. When people click on a video and the truth and facts make them uncomfortable they will continue to click on videos that make them feel good and 90% of the Time they end up watching a video pushing a agenda of fantasy and feelings The long them effect of this will kill morals and values and you will end up living in a fantasy world and the information that makes you feel good becomes true facts when really it's just a feeling with no facts or truth which will kill morals values & culture!!

    Get right with God harder times are coming

  52. Most intellectuals are mentally blinded by a stagnant loop of information and thought. They won't conclude otherwise, until some peer, or pressure makes them. And then only to force the round into the square because of there self created mental prison.

  53. You can use your brain..or you can allow others to feed it and use it for you! The history of LOCK STEP always in all ways linked to some fascist ideology..Socialists can be, and often are fascists! Think Stalin and Lenin!

  54. On the upside, mainstream medias ratings are on a downward spiral. Rejoice and speak out. Together, we do make a difference!

  55. Jordan Peterson is too smart for MSM and it scares them. I no longer watch their garbage and prefer alternative media, checking in with my own internal radar on who's worth listening to. We need more Jordan Petersons and less social media.

  56. Yay death to mainstream media Off With Their Heads! They suck so bad and I'm so happy to hear the good news

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *